Performance Assessment of Three Major Image Enhancement Techniques for Geospatial Data

PETER EKOW BAFFOE

Abstract


Image enhancement is one of the most important but difficult techniques for image processing researches. It is normally done to improve visual appearance and provide a better technique for future automated image processing. Sources of mages include satellite, photography and aerial photogrammetry that are used for geospatial data processing. These images suffer from poor contrast and noise. To use these images effectively, there is the need to enhance the contrast and remove the noise from the image to increase its quality. There are different techniques for image enhancement but this study focused on image interpolation. This multi-resolution technique is useful for variety of fields where fine and minor details are important. In this research, the Nearest Neighbor, Bilinear and Bicubic image interpolation algorithm were compared. Using the aforementioned techniques, two images were enhanced in order to compare their strengths and processing speed. The results of the algorithm of Nearest Neighbor had low computational time, low complexity of algorithm and poor image quality. On the other hand, the algorithms of Bilinear and Bicubic had average and high computational time, average and high complexity of algorithm and average and good image quality respectively.


Keywords


Image Enhancement, Interpolation algorithm, Geospatial

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anon. (2015), “Resizing An Image”, www.stackoverflow.com. Accessed: February 10, 2016.

Anon. (2014), “Matlab HELP [User’s Guide - Image Processing Toolbox]. Natick (Massachusetts, USA): The MathWorks Inc”, www.mathworks.com. Accessed: February 20, 2016.

Anon. (2014), “Image Types in the Toolbox”, www.mathworks.com. Accessed: February 20, 2016.

Anon. (2014), “Interpolation In One Dimension”, www.caam.rice.edu. Accessed: February 13, 2016.

Anon. (2012), “Digital Photo Enlargement”, www.cambridgeincolour.com. Accessed: March 02, 2016.

Anon. (2012), “Image Interpolation”, www.americaswonderworld.com. Accessed: March 02, 2016.

Anon. (2015), “Image Processing”, www.giassa.net. Accessed: March 03, 2016.

Anon. (2014), “Understanding Image Interpolation Techniques”, www.vision-systems.com. Accessed: March 03, 2012.

Anon. (2014), “Interpolation Theory”, http://sepwww.stanford.edu/public/ Accessed: March 03, 2012.

Bedi, S. and Khandelwal, R. (2013), “Various Image Enhancement Techniques - A Critical Review”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, Vol. 2, pp. 55-67.

Carlson, B. (2012), “Image Interpolation and Filtering”, IEEE Trans on ASSP, Vol. 6, pp. 32-45.

Gao, S. and Gruev, V. (2011), “Bilinear and Bicubic Interpolation Methods for Division of Focal Plane Polarimeters”, Open Science Journal, Vol. 19, Issue 27, pp. 1-13.

Han, D. (2013), “Comparison of Commonly Used Image Interpolation Methods”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Electronics Engineering (ICCSEE 2013), pp. 1- 4.

Kassab A. (2012), “Image Enhancement Methods and Implementation in Matlab”, Bsc project, Zapadoceska Univerzita V Plzni, 55pp.

Maeland E. and Gupta S. (2012), “On the Comparison of Interpolation Methods”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 213-217.

Robert G. (2012), “Cubic Convolution Interpolation for Digital Image Processing”, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Vol. ASSP-29, Issue 6, pp.1153-1160.

Thilina S. (2014), “Digital Image Zooming”, www.thilinasameera.wordpress.com. Accessed: March 04, 2016.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.